New Mexico approves sweeping PFAS Labeling Rule for Consumer Products

Santa Fe, New Mexico, US, March 2026 — The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) has approved expansive new requirements mandating consumer-facing labeling for products containing intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), creating one of the most comprehensive disclosure regimes in the United States.

Implementing the PFAS Protection Act (HB212), which was signed into law in 2025, the rule applies broadly to consumer products containing intentionally added PFAS. While the final rule text has not yet been published, NMED is expected to have adopted provisions largely consistent with the revised proposal presented during the February 2026 public hearing.

Scope of consumer products & exemption waiver

The new rule is expected to apply to a wide universe of consumer products, supported by a broad definition of “consumer,” which includes individuals, corporations, and state entities acquiring goods or services.

Products may avoid PFAS disclosure only if all three conditions are met:

  • PFAS-containing components never come into direct contact with consumers during normal use;

  • The product falls within specified exempt categories; and

  • The manufacturer obtains a formal waiver from NMED.

Potential exempt categories include:

  • Aircraft and watercraft

  • Energy generation and distribution equipment

  • Fungicide, pesticides, and rodenticides or similar regulated chemicals

  • Medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and veterinary products

  • Manufacturing equipment and semiconductors

  • Certain fluoropolymer-containing containing products

Motor vehicles are parts of the exempted categories, but components in vehicles such as textiles and refrigerants are still applicable.

To obtain a waiver/ exemption, manufacturers must submit:

  • Product identification details (e.g., SKU or UPC)

  • PFAS identity, function and concentration (with CAS numbers)

  • Justification for why labeling should not apply

Labeling requirements

The rule introduces highly prescriptive labeling requirements, including:

  • Labels must be conspicuous, durable, and visible at point of sale

  • Must appear on both product and packaging, where applicable

  • Required in English and Spanish

  • Must include a PFAS symbol (the word “PFAS” inside an Erlenmeyer flask outline)

Approved wording may include:

  • “Contains PFAS”

  • “Made with PFAS”

  • “This product is made with PFAS”Alternative labeling

Additional Requirements for Complex Durable Goods

For complex or durable products, disclosure extends beyond labeling. Product documentation must include the PFAS symbol and may include the disclosure statement similar to the label. Specification sheets must include the statement: “For more information on the location of components made with PFAS, review the product’s operation and maintenance manual.” Manuals or product sheets must identify: all PFAS-containing components, the location of the parts or materials with intended added PFAS within the products,

All required disclosures must be presented in 10-point font or larger.

Alternative Labeling Pathway

Manufacturers may use another state’s PFAS labeling regime in lieu of New Mexico’s requirements, but only with prior approval. To obtain approval, companies must: Submit the alternative label and demonstrate equivalency with New Mexico requirements.

NMED must respond within 90 days to confirm acceptance.

Compliance Timeline Aligned with PFAS Phase-Out

  • 1 January 2027 — Labeling and disclosure requirements take effect

  • 2027 — Initial product bans (e.g., cookware, food packaging)

  • 2028 — Expanded bans (e.g., cosmetics, furniture, carpets)

  • 2032 — Broad prohibition of PFAS in non-exempt products

The labeling requirement acts as a transitional compliance tool ahead of full phase-out.

Comparison with other US states

New Mexico’s rule stands out for its cross-product scope but other states also have PFAS disclosure for some products. By comparison, California, Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey require PFAS disclosure for cookware while disclosure for outdoor apparel are mandated by California, Colorado, Connecticut. Connecticut currently has the broadest multi-category disclosure rule. However, New Mexico is expected to surpass all states in scope and prescriptive detail.

Implications for industry

The rule signals a shift from targeted restrictions to full supply chain transparency as its impact extends beyond labeling. To properly label, companies must identify PFAS across products and components, which will require testing product testing, obtaining supplier declarations, and/or auditing supply chain audits. Failure to disclose PFAS may lead to administrative enforcement actions for inaction, or penalties for deceptive practices or even potential private litigation. At the same time, labeling PFAS may also triggers detailed reporting obligations in New Mexico and other jurisdictions and increase exposure to product safety claims across states who have banned PFAS.

Product Type States + Compliance Timeline Language Requirement Specific Phrases
All Consumer Products (intentionally added PFAS) New Mexico — 1 January 2027 New Mexico: English & Spanish New Mexico: “Contains PFAS” / “Made with PFAS” / “This product is made with PFAS” + PFAS symbol
Apparel Connecticut — 1 July 2026
New Mexico — 1 January 2027
Connecticut: Not specified (English likely mandatory)
New Mexico: English & Spanish
Connecticut: “Contains PFAS” / “Made with PFAS” / “Made with PFAS chemicals”
New Mexico: “Contains PFAS” / “Made with PFAS”
Cookware California — 1 January 2024
Colorado — 1 January 2024 (ended 1 January 2026)
Connecticut — 1 July 2026
New Mexico — 1 January 2027
New Jersey — 12 January 2028
California: Not specified (English likely mandatory)
Colorado: Not specified (English likely mandatory)
Connecticut: Not specified (English likely mandatory)
New Mexico: English & Spanish
New Jersey: English & Spanish
California: “This product contains:” + website disclosure
Colorado: “For more information about PFAS chemicals in this product, visit”
Connecticut: “Contains PFAS”
New Mexico: “Contains PFAS”
New Jersey: “This product contains PFAS”
Cosmetics Connecticut — 1 July 2026
New Mexico — 1 January 2027
Connecticut: Not specified (English likely mandatory)
New Mexico: English & Spanish
Connecticut: “Contains PFAS” / “Made with PFAS chemicals”
New Mexico: “Contains PFAS”
Feminine Hygiene Products Connecticut — 1 July 2026
New Mexico — 1 January 2027
Connecticut: Not specified (English likely mandatory)
New Mexico: English & Spanish
Connecticut: “Contains PFAS” / “Made with PFAS chemicals”
New Mexico: “Contains PFAS”
Outdoor Apparel (Severe Wet Conditions) California — 1 January 2025
Colorado — 1 January 2025 to 31 December 2027
Connecticut — 1 January 2026
Not specified (English likely mandatory) California / Colorado / Connecticut: “Made with PFAS chemicals”
Turnout Gear (Firefighting) Connecticut — 1 January 2026 Not specified (English likely mandatory) Connecticut: Written notice that product contains intentionally added PFAS + reason for use

‍ ‍




Previous
Previous

Public comment period is ending for Minnesota’s “unavoidable use” rule for exempting PFAS prohibition

Next
Next

Washington Revises Lead Limits for Cookware, Extends Timeline